if
cond
“Flow control” is the programming term for deciding how to react to a given circumstance. We make decisions like this all the time. If it’s a nice day out, then we should visit the park; otherwise we should stay inside and play board games. If your car’s tank is empty, then you should visit a gas station; otherwise you should continue to your destination.
Software is also full of these decisions. If the user’s input is valid, then we should save their data; otherwise we show an error message. The common pattern here is that you test some condition and react differently based on whether the condition is true or false.
if
In Clojure, the most basic tool we have for the flow control is the
if
operator. It allows you to choose between two options depending upon a condition.
Reference: Conditional
if
(if (< age legal-drinking-age)
["water" "soda"]
["water" "soda" "beer" "wine"])
(if conditional-expression
expression-to-evaluate-when-true
expression-to-evaluate-when-false)
When testing the truth of an expression, Clojure considers the values
nil
andfalse
to be false and everything else to be true. Here are some examples:
Reference: Truthiness
(if "anything other than nil or false is considered true"
"A string is considered true"
"A string is not considered true")
;=> "A string is considered true"
(if nil
"nil is considered true"
"nil is not considered true")
;=> "nil is not considered true"
(if (get {:a 1} :b)
"expressions which evaluate to nil are considered true"
"expressions which evaluate to nil are not considered true")
;=> "expressions which evaluate to nil are not considered true"
ordinal
that takes a number n
as an argumentn
equals 1
, then the function should return "1st"
, otherwise it should return the number + "th"
str
function(defn ordinal [n]
(if ;; condition
;; then
;; else
))
;; usage of ordinal function
(ordinal 1) ;=> "1st"
(ordinal 5) ;=> "5th"
ordinal
function to correctly generate “2nd” and “3rd”if
inside another if
;; usage of the new ordinal function
(ordinal 1) ;=> "1st"
(ordinal 2) ;=> "2nd"
(ordinal 3) ;=> "3rd"
(ordinal 4) ;=> "4th"
cond
The
if
operator takes only one predicate. When we want to use multiple predicates,if
is not a good option. We have to write nested, nested, … and nestedif
conditions. To branch to multiple situations,cond
operator works well.
Reference: Conditional
cond
(if (= n 1)
"1st"
(if (= n 2)
"2nd"
(if (= n 3)
"3rd"
(str n "th"))))
In this case cond
comes in handy.
(cond
(= n 1) "1st"
(= n 2) "2nd"
(= n 3) "3rd"
:else (str n "th"))
cond
operator(cond
predicate1 expression-to-evaluate-when-predicate1-is-true
predicate2 expression-to-evaluate-when-predicate2-is-true
...
:else expression-to-evaluate-when-all-above-are-false)
cond
example(cond
(< x 10) "x is smaller than 10"
(< 10 x 20) "x is between 10 and 20"
(< 20 x 30) "x is between 20 and 30"
(< 30 x 40) "x is between 30 and 40"
:else "x is bigger than 40")
cond
Write a function that can convert degrees Celcius, Fahrenheit, or Kelvin to Celcius
Here is how it should work
(to-celcius 32.0 :F) ;=> 0.0
(to-celcius 300 :K) ;=> 26.85
(to-celcius 22.5 :C) ;=> 22.5
(to-celcius 22.5 :gibberish) ;=> "Unknown scale: :gibberish"
Starting point:
(defn to-celcius [degrees scale]
(cond
;; ...
))
Formulas:
Write a function that can convert degrees Celcius, Fahrenheit, or Kelvin to Celcius
(defn to-celcius [degrees scale]
(cond
(= scale :C) degrees
(= scale :F) (* (- degrees 32) 5/9)
(= scale :K) (- degrees 273.15)
:else (str "Unknown scale: " scale)))
(to-celcius 32.0 :F) ;=> 0.0
(to-celcius 300 :K) ;=> 26.85
(to-celcius 22.5 :C) ;=> 22.5
(to-celcius 22.5 :gibberish) ;=> "Unknown scale: :gibberish"
and
, or
, and not
if
statements are not limited to testing only one thing. You can test multiple conditions using boolean logic. Boolean logic refers to combining and changing the results of predicates usingand
,or
, andnot
.
If you’ve never seen this concept in programming before, remember that it follows the common sense way you look at things normally. Is this and that true? Only if both are true. Is this or that true? Yes, if either – or both! – are. Is this not true? Yes, if it’s false.
and
,or
, andnot
work like other functions (they aren’t exactly functions, but work like them), so they are in prefix notation, like we’ve seen with arithmetic.
x | y | (and x y) |
(or x y) |
(not x) |
(not y) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
false | false | false | false | true | true |
true | false | false | true | false | true |
true | true | true | true | false | false |
false | true | false | true | true | false |
and
, or
, and not
combination
and
,or
, andnot
can be combined. This can be hard to read. Here’s an example:
(defn leap-year?
"Every four years, except years divisible by 100, but yes for years divisible by 400."
[year]
(and (zero? (mod year 4))
(or (zero? (mod year 400))
(not (zero? (mod year 100))))))
Return to the first slide, or go to the curriculum outline.